Allied Solutions

A discovery research initiative mapping the end-to-end client experience across the ARM repossession lifecycle, and surfacing the highest-impact opportunities for CenterPoint's next development cycle.

Senior UX Researcher & Designer

~11 Weeks

Interviews, Journey Mapping,

Design, Usability Testing

CLIENT VOICE

"It would be nice to see all of the actions and all of the correspondence in one place... a page that we would go to and then once it's been resolved, be able to move it out of that pipeline."

— Sr. Repo Specialist · PenFed Credit Union

1

CONTEXT

Lenders couldn't see what was happening to their assets

Allied Solutions manages asset recovery: repossession, remarketing, and claims — on behalf of credit unions and banks. Their CenterPoint portal was the client's window into that work, but lenders were operating blind.Status updates arrived by email. Auction outcomes required phone calls. Title delays had no explanation. My task was to understand exactly where visibility broke down and map the entire client journey.

The Core Problem

CenterPoint existed but lenders had developed parallel shadow systems — Outlook folders, Excel trackers, and phone trees — to manage work the product should have been doing.

11 Week

Discovery Sprint

5+

Credit Unions

Interviewed

2

DISCOVERY RESEARCH

What I found

Moderated interviews and workflow walkthroughs with repo specialists, managers, and client leads. Sessions followed a demo-first, discussion-second format to observe natural task flows before probing.

01

Workflow Fragmentation

Clients managed repossession entirely through Outlook folders and subfolders. No centralized view existed for active cases, holds, or pending actions.

02

Blind Spots

Zero in-app visibility into auction scheduling, sale outcomes, or title processing delays. Every update required a manual call or email to Allied staff.

03

Manual Reporting

Every client maintained parallel Excel trackers to reconcile CenterPoint data with internal records. Some ran daily exports just to stay current.

3

JOURNEY MAPPING

The client experience, phase by phase

Mapping the lender journey revealed consistent pain at every handoff; from repo order through to proceeds recovery. Each phase introduced a new visibility gap.

ORDER PLACED

Lender submits via RDN or AutoIMS

Case created in Pega ARM

Vendor assignment begins

Pain Point

No actionable confirmation returned to lender

ACTIVE REPO

Vendor attempts asset pickup

Updates flow only through RDN

Lender calls Allied to check status

Pain Point

No visibility into vendor activity or location

POST-REPO

Notice of intent to sell is sent to borrower

Redemption window tracked by email

Title request submitted externally

Pain Point

Title delays unexplained; multiple platforms checked

REMARKETING

Asset sent to auction or private sale

Sale communicated by phone

Proceeds calculated manually

Pain Point

Auction results invisible. Car can be sitting for months.

CLAIMS & CLOSE

Claim filed; status tracked

Proceeds reconciled internally

Case manually closed out

Pain Point

Inconsistent data across platforms. Hard to send out reports.

4

KEY INSIGHTS

What the research revealed

Email is the de-facto case management system

Lenders created Outlook folder hierarchies to track active cases, holds, NOI statuses, and document requests; work CenterPoint should be doing. The inbox had become the product.

Clients want self-serve, not support tickets

Every client preferred in-app access to auction results, title statuses, and claim history. Depending on Allied staff for basic status updates was a trust and efficiency issue, as speed and accuracy were top priority.

Notification preferences

are shifting

Clients want to move from email-based updates to in-app notifications with optional email digests; particularly for high-priority events like redemptions and auction outcomes.

5

DELIVERABLES

What came out of it

Research outputs fed directly into CenterPoint's design backlog and aligned with Pega ARM's development schedule.

End-to-End Journey Map

5-phase lender journey mapping touchpoints, tools, pain points, and emotional state across the full ARM lifecycle.

Client Personas

4 personas (Repo Specialist, Sr. Manager, Claims Lead, Portfolio Manager) grounded in interview data.

What’s the current status of the titling?

Has the Notice of Intent date been sent out?

Current-State Workflow Documentation

Analysis of how lenders use email, Excel, RDN, and AutoIMS together to manage recovery today.

Design Mockups

Centralized dashboard concept with real-time case visibility, auction status, title tracking, and in-app notifications.

Reporting

Research Report

Cross-client synthesis with prioritized opportunity areas, risk flags, and recommendations for product.

Usability Test Protocol

Maze-based unmoderated test targeting 80% task completion; metrics: SUS, SEQ, task time, misclick rate.

6

OUTCOMES

Impact & forward direction

Research directly shaped CenterPoint's design roadmap and created alignment across UX, product, and engineering on what to build first.

5

Credit union clients interviewed across discovery

3

Cross-client themes validated with full consistency

80%

Target task completion rate set for usability validation

1st

Structured UX research program established for ARM

© Jake Ledford 2026

Allied Solutions

A discovery research initiative mapping the end-to-end client experience across the ARM repossession lifecycle, and surfacing the highest-impact opportunities for CenterPoint's next development cycle.

Senior UX Researcher & Designer

~11 Weeks

Interviews, Journey Mapping, Design, Usability Testing

CLIENT VOICE

"It would be nice to see all of the actions and all of the correspondence in one place... a page that we would go to and then once it's been resolved, be able to move it out of that pipeline."

— Sr. Repo Specialist · PenFed Credit Union

1

CONTEXT

Lenders couldn't see what was happening to their assets

Allied Solutions manages asset recovery: repossession, remarketing, and claims — on behalf of credit unions and banks. Their CenterPoint portal was the client's window into that work, but lenders were operating blind.Status updates arrived by email. Auction outcomes required phone calls. Title delays had no explanation. My task was to understand exactly where visibility broke down and map the entire client journey.

The Core Problem

CenterPoint existed but lenders had developed parallel shadow systems — Outlook folders, Excel trackers, and phone trees — to manage work the product should have been doing.

11 Week

Discovery Sprint

M

t

w

t

f

s

s

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5+

Credit Unions

Interviewed

2

DISCOVERY RESEARCH

What I found

Moderated interviews and workflow walkthroughs with repo specialists, managers, and client leads. Sessions followed a demo-first, discussion-second format to observe natural task flows before probing.

01

Workflow Fragmentation

Clients managed repossession entirely through Outlook folders and subfolders. No centralized view existed for active cases, holds, or pending actions.

02

Blind Spots

Zero in-app visibility into auction scheduling, sale outcomes, or title processing delays. Every update required a manual call or email to Allied staff.

03

Manual Reporting

Every client maintained parallel Excel trackers to reconcile CenterPoint data with internal records. Some ran daily exports just to stay current.

3

JOURNEY MAPPING

The client experience, phase by phase

Mapping the lender journey revealed consistent pain at every handoff; from repo order through to proceeds recovery. Each phase introduced a new visibility gap.

ORDER PLACED

Lender submits via RDN or AutoIMS

Case created in Pega ARM

Vendor assignment begins

Pain Point

No actionable confirmation returned to lender

ACTIVE REPO

Vendor attempts asset pickup

Updates flow only through RDN

Lender calls Allied to check status

Pain Point

No visibility into vendor activity or location

POST-REPO

Notice of intent to sell is sent to borrower

Redemption window tracked by email

Title request submitted externally

Pain Point

Title delays unexplained; multiple platforms checked

REMARKETING

Asset sent to auction or private sale

Sale communicated by phone

Proceeds calculated manually

Pain Point

Auction results invisible. Car can be sitting for months.

CLAIMS & CLOSE

Claim filed; status tracked

Proceeds reconciled internally

Case manually closed out

Pain Point

Inconsistent data across platforms. Hard to send out reports.

4

KEY INSIGHTS

What the research revealed

Email is the de-facto case management system

Lenders created Outlook folder hierarchies to track active cases, holds, NOI statuses, and document requests; work CenterPoint should be doing. The inbox had become the product.

Clients want self-serve, not support tickets

Every client preferred in-app access to auction results, title statuses, and claim history. Depending on Allied staff for basic status updates was a trust and efficiency issue, as speed and accuracy were top priority.

Notification preferences

are shifting

Clients want to move from email-based updates to in-app notifications with optional email digests; particularly for high-priority events like redemptions and auction outcomes.

5

DELIVERABLES

What came out of it

Research outputs fed directly into CenterPoint's design backlog and aligned with Pega ARM's development schedule.

End-to-End Journey Map

5-phase lender journey mapping touchpoints, tools, pain points, and emotional state across the full ARM lifecycle.

Client Personas

4 personas (Repo Specialist, Sr. Manager, Claims Lead, Portfolio Manager) grounded in interview data.

What’s the current status of the titling?

Has the Notice of Intent date been sent out?

Does this asset need to be filed as a SKIP claim?

Current-State Workflow Documentation

Analysis of how lenders use email, Excel, RDN, and AutoIMS together to manage recovery today.

Design Mockups

Centralized dashboard concept with real-time case visibility, auction status, title tracking, and in-app notifications.

Reporting

Research Report

Cross-client synthesis with prioritized opportunity areas, risk flags, and recommendations for product.

Usability Test Protocol

Maze-based unmoderated test targeting 80% task completion; metrics: SUS, SEQ, task time, misclick rate.

6

OUTCOMES

Impact & forward direction

Research directly shaped CenterPoint's design roadmap and created alignment across UX, product, and engineering on what to build first.

5

Credit union clients interviewed across discovery

3

Cross-client themes validated with full consistency

80%

Target task completion rate set for usability validation

1st

Structured UX research program established for ARM

Indianapolis, IN, USA

© Jake Ledford 2026

Allied Solutions

A discovery research initiative mapping the end-to-end client experience across the ARM repossession lifecycle, and surfacing the highest-impact opportunities for CenterPoint's next development cycle.

Senior UX Researcher & Designer

~11 Weeks

Interviews, Journey Mapping, Design, Usability Testing

CLIENT VOICE

"It would be nice to see all of the actions and all of the correspondence in one place... a page that we would go to and then once it's been resolved, be able to move it out of that pipeline."

— Sr. Repo Specialist · PenFed Credit Union

1

CONTEXT

Lenders couldn't see what was happening to their assets

Allied Solutions manages asset recovery: repossession, remarketing, and claims — on behalf of credit unions and banks. Their CenterPoint portal was the client's window into that work, but lenders were operating blind.Status updates arrived by email. Auction outcomes required phone calls. Title delays had no explanation. My task was to understand exactly where visibility broke down and map the entire client journey.

The Core Problem

CenterPoint existed but lenders had developed parallel shadow systems — Outlook folders, Excel trackers, and phone trees — to manage work the product should have been doing.

11 Week

Discovery Sprint

M

t

w

t

f

s

s

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5+

Credit Unions

Interviewed

2

DISCOVERY RESEARCH

What I found

Moderated interviews and workflow walkthroughs with repo specialists, managers, and client leads. Sessions followed a demo-first, discussion-second format to observe natural task flows before probing.

01

Workflow Fragmentation

Clients managed repossession entirely through Outlook folders and subfolders. No centralized view existed for active cases, holds, or pending actions.

02

Blind Spots

Zero in-app visibility into auction scheduling, sale outcomes, or title processing delays. Every update required a manual call or email to Allied staff.

03

Manual Reporting

Every client maintained parallel Excel trackers to reconcile CenterPoint data with internal records. Some ran daily exports just to stay current.

3

JOURNEY MAPPING

The client experience, phase by phase

Mapping the lender journey revealed consistent pain at every handoff; from repo order through to proceeds recovery. Each phase introduced a new visibility gap.

ORDER PLACED

Lender submits via RDN or AutoIMS

Case created in Pega ARM

Vendor assignment begins

Pain Point

No actionable confirmation returned to lender

ACTIVE REPO

Vendor attempts asset pickup

Updates flow only through RDN

Lender calls Allied to check status

Pain Point

No visibility into vendor activity or location

POST-REPO

Notice of intent to sell is sent to borrower

Redemption window tracked by email

Title request submitted externally

Pain Point

Title delays unexplained; multiple platforms checked

REMARKETING

Asset sent to auction or private sale

Sale communicated by phone

Proceeds calculated manually

Pain Point

Auction results invisible. Car can be sitting for months.

CLAIMS & CLOSE

Claim filed; status tracked

Proceeds reconciled internally

Case manually closed out

Pain Point

Inconsistent data across platforms. Hard to send out reports.

4

KEY INSIGHTS

What the research revealed

Email is the de-facto case management system

Lenders created Outlook folder hierarchies to track active cases, holds, NOI statuses, and document requests; work CenterPoint should be doing. The inbox had become the product.

Clients want self-serve, not support tickets

Every client preferred in-app access to auction results, title statuses, and claim history. Depending on Allied staff for basic status updates was a trust and efficiency issue, as speed and accuracy were top priority.

Notification preferences

are shifting

Clients want to move from email-based updates to in-app notifications with optional email digests; particularly for high-priority events like redemptions and auction outcomes.

5

DELIVERABLES

What came out of it

Research outputs fed directly into CenterPoint's design backlog and aligned with Pega ARM's development schedule.

End-to-End Journey Map

5-phase lender journey mapping touchpoints, tools, pain points, and emotional state across the full ARM lifecycle.

Client Personas

4 personas (Repo Specialist, Sr. Manager, Claims Lead, Portfolio Manager) grounded in interview data.

What’s the current status of the titling?

Has the Notice of Intent date been sent out?

Does this asset need to be filed as a SKIP claim?

Current-State Workflow Documentation

Analysis of how lenders use email, Excel, RDN, and AutoIMS together to manage recovery today.

Design Mockups

Centralized dashboard concept with real-time case visibility, auction status, title tracking, and in-app notifications.

Reporting

Research Report

Cross-client synthesis with prioritized opportunity areas, risk flags, and recommendations for product.

Usability Test Protocol

Maze-based unmoderated test targeting 80% task completion; metrics: SUS, SEQ, task time, misclick rate.

6

OUTCOMES

Impact & forward direction

Research directly shaped CenterPoint's design roadmap and created alignment across UX, product, and engineering on what to build first.

5

Credit union clients interviewed across discovery

3

Cross-client themes validated with full consistency

80%

Target task completion rate set for usability validation

1st

Structured UX research program established for ARM

Indianapolis, IN, USA

© Jake Ledford 2026